Timeline for xgboost Predictions from R and Python don't match
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 23:17 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Dec 1, 2016 at 22:41 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 1, 2016 at 22:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 2, 2016 at 21:57 | answer | added | sergeyf | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 1, 2016 at 20:32 | comment | added | sergeyf | @phiver That's a great point. It looks like the CRAN version hasn't been updated in quite a while. | |
| Oct 1, 2016 at 10:30 | comment | added | phiver | I checked the github issue you are referring to. Could it be because of difference in xgboost version? The model was built under xgboost 0.6, while the R version used is version 0.4-4. | |
| Sep 30, 2016 at 10:56 | answer | added | janpreet singh | timeline score: -1 | |
| Sep 30, 2016 at 8:43 | comment | added | phiver | have you read this entry on kaggle? or this one? | |
| Sep 30, 2016 at 4:47 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 30, 2016 at 5:23 | |||||
| Sep 30, 2016 at 4:45 | history | asked | sergeyf | CC BY-SA 3.0 |