Timeline for Does the Bishop book imply that a neuron feeds to itself in chapter 5.3?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2016 at 11:36 | vote | accept | Kiki Rizki Arpiandi | ||
| Oct 21, 2016 at 11:35 | comment | added | Kiki Rizki Arpiandi | Yes I agree with you the mathematical notation is misleading. | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 11:28 | comment | added | mxdbld | Mathematically speaking, the notation is wrong or misleading, yes. a_2 refers to two different entities here | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 11:12 | comment | added | Kiki Rizki Arpiandi | I agree with you that bishop try to simplfy the equation but with bishop equation it make z 2 term exist in the right hand side of the equation, while z_2 term in the right hand side is activated neuron from the previous layer its make, but with the sampe notation (z_2), without super script indicate that both of them has the same value, which is actualy not | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 10:59 | comment | added | mxdbld | I guess he wants to simplify the equations and the notation to the maximum | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 10:57 | comment | added | Kiki Rizki Arpiandi | So what does bishop try to points out? | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 10:39 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 21, 2016 at 11:12 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2016 at 10:36 | history | answered | mxdbld | CC BY-SA 3.0 |