Timeline for XGBoost Classification Probabilities higher than RF or SVM?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2018 at 16:37 | vote | accept | msubbaiah | ||
| Apr 2, 2018 at 12:20 | history | edited | timleathart | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Dec 21, 2017 at 21:56 | history | edited | timleathart | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added clarification
|
| S Dec 21, 2017 at 21:36 | history | suggested | aivanov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
„Poorly calibrated“ can be misunderstood as if the predictions still poor after the calibration which is not the case.
|
| Dec 21, 2017 at 21:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 21, 2017 at 21:36 | |||||
| Dec 21, 2017 at 21:02 | history | answered | timleathart | CC BY-SA 3.0 |