Timeline for Does Tensorflow support a Decision Tree Classifier?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Mar 8, 2019 at 20:11 | history | suggested | Oussama He | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
using quotes
|
Mar 8, 2019 at 19:29 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Mar 8, 2019 at 20:11 | |||||
Feb 26, 2018 at 17:07 | vote | accept | Taimur Islam | ||
Feb 20, 2018 at 14:26 | comment | added | S van Balen | TF supports random forest, random forest is a decision tree (a specific type at that), hence TF supports decision trees. But like I said: I'm torn at whether your statement is wrong: Technically it is, but for all practical purposes it is not. | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 14:10 | comment | added | Green Falcon |
@SvanBalen I thank you if I really have made a mistake for announcing me but I don't know where I'm wrong. I've said TensorFlow does not support decision trees, which is really the case. Which part I'm wrong?
|
|
Feb 20, 2018 at 14:06 | comment | added | S van Balen | Tensorflow supports random forrest (as documented by the link you gave), random forrest is a special kind of tree learner. So even though Tensorflow doenst seem to support common learners (CART or C45) and even though it is primarily a library for deep learning, and even though I too would use sklearn, it technically supports a tree learner, making your statement false. | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 13:57 | comment | added | Green Falcon | @SvanBalen I don't understand what you mean. | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 13:19 | comment | added | S van Balen | I'm torn on this: I'm aboard with the reasoning of your quote, but on the other hand: Random Forrest is a kind of tree learner. | |
Feb 20, 2018 at 12:38 | history | answered | Green Falcon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |