Timeline for Strange Behavior for trying to Predict Tennis Millionaires with Keras (Validation Accuracy)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2018 at 1:24 | comment | added | psygo |
I had already tried to do that, as I specified in the original question. I've tried it again with sklearn's more compact train_test_split and it still doesn't work.
|
|
| Sep 20, 2018 at 23:32 | history | edited | Francesco Pegoraro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 314 characters in body
|
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:41 | comment | added | psygo |
Your suggestion for using binary_crossentropy does work as an alternative way of doing the same thing, but it doesn't seem to solve the problem, I still get the weird complementary accuracies. Thanks for clarifying the difference between binary_crossentropy and categorical_crossentropy though.
|
|
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:38 | comment | added | psygo |
Can't you really find the files I mentioned? They are here, aren't they? Though there is a lot of stuff there, the only files you need is the data (atp_python_2018-08-27_1-1500.json) and the Jupyter Notebook (ATP NN.ipynb).
|
|
| Sep 20, 2018 at 22:13 | history | answered | Francesco Pegoraro | CC BY-SA 4.0 |