Skip to main content
Data Science

Return to Answer

added 3 characters in body
Source Link
Antonio Jurić
Antonio Jurić
  • 1.1k
  • 8
  • 14

You could rotate images manually (without using ImageDataGenerator) and save it to disk. That way you would know which images you have rotated - so you would know which images have changed the class.

After it, when using ImageDataGenerator, you need to set rotation_range to small value in order to be sure that it won't change the classes of images.

Examples how to rotate image manually can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/43864937/5997950

You could rotate images manually (without using ImageDataGenerator) and save it disk. That way you would know which images you have rotated - so you would know which images have changed the class.

After it, when using ImageDataGenerator, you need to set rotation_range to small value in order to be sure that it won't change the classes of images.

Examples how to rotate image manually can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/43864937/5997950

You could rotate images manually (without using ImageDataGenerator) and save it to disk. That way you would know which images you have rotated - so you would know which images have changed the class.

After it, when using ImageDataGenerator, you need to set rotation_range to small value in order to be sure that it won't change the classes of images.

Examples how to rotate image manually can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/43864937/5997950

Source Link
Antonio Jurić
Antonio Jurić
  • 1.1k
  • 8
  • 14

You could rotate images manually (without using ImageDataGenerator) and save it disk. That way you would know which images you have rotated - so you would know which images have changed the class.

After it, when using ImageDataGenerator, you need to set rotation_range to small value in order to be sure that it won't change the classes of images.

Examples how to rotate image manually can be found here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/43864937/5997950