Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 15, 2021 at 13:48 answer added Pawan Arya timeline score: 0
Mar 12, 2021 at 2:19 answer added Nick Corona timeline score: 1
Jan 17, 2020 at 19:23 comment added Matthew Drury As mentioned in @Ray's answer, it is not correct that the first model is necessarily overfit. Random Forests, for example, are explicitly designed to produce this situation.
Jan 13, 2020 at 21:57 comment added David Waterworth The test and train set metrics are random variables - if for example you're using k-fold cross validation then you can estimate the confidence of both using the variance for example - this could indicate that you cannot really say 1 is higher than 2 with say 90% confidence. So whilst it's a bit hand wavey I would prefer the model which generalises better
Jan 13, 2020 at 21:41 answer added Acccumulation timeline score: 4
Jan 13, 2020 at 19:20 review Close votes
Jan 14, 2020 at 4:30
Jan 13, 2020 at 19:17 answer added Ray timeline score: 9
Jan 13, 2020 at 11:19 answer added Itamar Mushkin timeline score: 0
Jan 13, 2020 at 10:41 comment added Mast Can we have a third option: use the second to further improve into a third? The second is likely more salvageable than the first, but neither would be ideal in production. What is your goal?
Jan 13, 2020 at 9:27 comment added Will 1% difference in test accuracy will not be statistically significant for many test sets. How big is yours?
Jan 13, 2020 at 6:55 comment added jerlich The difference of 1% on the test set makes it easy to choose the 2nd one. But I think if the difference was 10% on the test set than people might choose the "overfit" model.
Jan 13, 2020 at 2:54 answer added Ben Reiniger timeline score: 16
Jan 12, 2020 at 21:58 history became hot network question
Jan 12, 2020 at 15:37 answer added FrancoSwiss timeline score: 4
Jan 12, 2020 at 14:27 answer added Noah Weber timeline score: 22
Jan 12, 2020 at 13:50 review First posts
Jan 12, 2020 at 15:17
Jan 12, 2020 at 13:48 history asked EitanT CC BY-SA 4.0