Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 12, 2020 at 14:04 comment added Ben The roc curves indicate how the model performs with varying thresholds of its continuos output. So even though the auc is between 0 and 1, that doesn't provide insight into statistically significant differences between models. You'd still need multiple trials in which you change only a single independent variable to get statistically significant comparisons.
Sep 12, 2020 at 8:46 comment added Dieshe Thanks for the Answer Benji Albert. I thought about it and came to the conclusion that a ROC-AUC Metric (for example) must have a specific distribution since it must be between 0 and 1. While other Metrics like MSE can not be smaller than 0 but can be infinite. Isnt that something that could be recognized when doing the significance analysis?
Sep 11, 2020 at 22:13 comment added Ben Oh I assumed you'd be able to rerun your experiment. If not, I'm not sure there's a way to get meaningful comparisons due to both the confounding variables and the small sample size. I think the best you could do is, as you've recently added in your edit, perform a test like MWW, which is better in this case than t test because the t-test can be more vulnerable to outliers. However, if you are looking to publish the results in some form, you should probably collect data that you can compare more meaningfully.
Sep 11, 2020 at 19:41 comment added Dieshe For Wilcoxon signed-rank test both sample have to have the same size. In my example I have 30 and then only 5. So this does not work.
Sep 11, 2020 at 19:29 comment added Dieshe I thought you need matched pairs to do a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Like human before and after a treatment. In this case I do not have these pairs if I am not wrong.
Sep 11, 2020 at 17:53 history answered Ben CC BY-SA 4.0