- the problem lies in the field of natural science, i.e. relationships between variables are physics-based and does not change depending on context
- its a regression based model
Would it be right to assume that kernelized approaches (e.g. SVM) would perform better for unseen combinations of predictor variables, when compared to neural networks etc?
As I understood, many ML models generally fail to provide accurate prediction when the new inputs are out of distributions they were initially trained on. E.g. tree based methods, like random forest, while providing excellent output on the trained combinations of predictors fail if new variables are out of bag. On other hand,kernels ( especially the linear) project decision boundaries beyond the space of the initial training points. So assumingly, kernel-projected thresholds/boundaries help to maintain a better accuracy for unseen combinations.