If I understand you correctly, you want to err on the side of overestimating. If so, you need an appropriate, asymmetric cost function. One simple candidate is to tweak the squared loss:
$\mathcal L: (x,\alpha) \to x^2 \left( \mathrm{sgn} x + \alpha \right)^2$
where $-1 < \alpha < 1$ is a parameter you can use to trade off the penalty of underestimation against overestimation. Positive values of $\alpha$ penalize overestimation, so you will want to set $\alpha$ negative. In python this looks like def loss(x, a): return x**2 * (numpy.sign(x) + a)**2

Next let's generate some data:
import numpy
x = numpy.arange(-10, 10, 0.1)
y = -0.1*x**2 + x + numpy.sin(x) + 0.1*numpy.random.randn(len(x))

Finally, we will do our regression in tensorflow
, a machine learning library from Google that supports automated differentiation (making gradient-based optimization of such problems simpler). I will use this example as a starting point.
import tensorflow as tf
X = tf.placeholder("float") # create symbolic variables
Y = tf.placeholder("float")
w = tf.Variable(0.0, name="coeff")
b = tf.Variable(0.0, name="offset")
y_model = tf.mul(X, w) + b
cost = tf.pow(y_model-Y, 2) # use sqr error for cost function
def acost(a): return tf.pow(y_model-Y, 2) * tf.pow(tf.sign(y_model-Y) + a, 2)
train_op = tf.train.AdamOptimizer().minimize(cost)
train_op2 = tf.train.AdamOptimizer().minimize(acost(-0.5))
sess = tf.Session()
init = tf.initialize_all_variables()
sess.run(init)
for i in range(100):
for (xi, yi) in zip(x, y):
# sess.run(train_op, feed_dict={X: xi, Y: yi})
sess.run(train_op2, feed_dict={X: xi, Y: yi})
print(sess.run(w), sess.run(b))
cost
is the regular squared error, while acost
is the aforementioned asymmetric loss function.
If you use cost
you get
1.00764 -3.32445

If you use acost
you get
1.02604 -1.07742

acost
clearly tries not to underestimate. I did not check for convergence, but you get the idea.