I'm trying to describe mathematically how stochastic gradient descent could be used to minimize the binary cross entropy loss.

The typical description of SGD is that I can find online is: $\theta = \theta - \eta *\nabla_{\theta}J(\theta,x^{(i)},y^{(i)})$ where $\theta$ is the parameter to optimize the objective function $J$ over, and x and y come from the training set. Specifically the $(i)$ indicates that it is the i-th observation from the training set.

For binary cross entropy loss, I am using the following definition (following https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.14119): $$ L_{tot} = \sum_{k=1}^K L(\sigma(z_k),y_k)\\ L = -yL_+ - (1-y)L_- \\ L_+ = log(p)\\ L_- = log(1-p)\\ $$ where $\sigma$ is the sigmoid function, $z_k$ is a prediction (one digit) and $y_k$ is the true value. To better explain this, I am training my model to predict a 0-1 vector like [0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0], so it might predict something like [0.03, 0.90, 0.98, 0.02, 0.85, 0.1], which then means that e.g. $z_3 = 0.98$.

For combining these definitions, I think that the binary cross entropy loss is minimized by using the parameters $z_k$ (as this is what the model tries to learn), so that in my case $\theta = z$.

Then in order to combine the equations, what I would think makes sense is the following: $z = z - \eta*\nabla_zL_{tot}(z^{(i)},y^{(i)})$

However I am unsure about the following:

  1. One part of the formula contains $z$, and another part contains $z^{(i)}$, this doesn't make much sense to me. Should I use only $z$ everywhere? But then how would it be clear that we have prediction $z$ for the true $y^{(i)}$?
  2. In the original SGD formula there is also an $x^{(i)}$. Since this is not part of the binary cross entropy loss function, can I just omit this $x^{(i)}$?

Any help with the above two points and finding the correct equation for SGD for binary cross entropy loss would be greatly appreciated.


1 Answer 1


You are confusing a number of definitions. The loss definition you provided is correct, yet the terms you used are not precise. I'll try to make the following concepts clearer for you: parameters, predictions and logits. I want you to focus on the logit concept, which is I believe the issue here.

First, binary classification is a learning task where we want to predict which of two classes 0 (negative class) and 1 (positive class) an example $x$ comes from.

Binary cross entropy is a loss function that is frequently used for such tasks. And, to use this loss function, the model is expected to output one real number $\hat{y} \in [0,1]$ for each example $x$. $\hat{y}$ represents the probability that the example is from the positive class 1. I'd rather write the loss as follows: $$\begin{align} L &= \sum_{i=1}^n l(\hat{y_i}, y_i)\\ l(\hat{y_i}, y_i) &= -y_i log(\hat{y_i}) -(1-y_i) log(1-\hat{y_i}) \end{align}$$

Now, the way our predictions $\hat{y}$ are computed depends on the family of models we choose to use.

For example, if you use a logistic regression model, the model computes predictions as follows $\hat{y} = \sigma(z)$, where $z \in \mathbb{R}$ is called the logit (not the prediction) and $\sigma$ is the sigmoid function. In logistic regression, the logit is a linear function of your features $z = \theta x$, where $\theta$ is the parameter vector (which is independent from your set of examples) and $x$ is the example vector. So, $$\hat{y_i} = \sigma(z_i) = \sigma(\theta x_i) $$

In this case, the loss becomes: $$\begin{align} L &= \sum_{i=1}^n -y_i log(\hat{y_i}) -(1-y_i) log(1-\hat{y_i}) \\ &= \sum_{i=1}^n -y_i log(\sigma(\theta x_i) ) -(1-y_i) log(1-\sigma(\theta x_i) ) \end{align}$$

Now, compute the gradient of $L$ with respect to $\theta$ and plug it in your SGD update rule.

To summarize, predictions are related to logits by the sigmoid function, and logits are related to example features by model parameters.

I used logistic regression to simplify the discussion. Using a neural network, the relationship between logits and model parameters becomes more complicated.

Last, I want to clarify that SGD can be used with a variety of models, so when you say it contains $x_i$ in its formula, you need to specify which family of models you are talking about.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.