In this paper, the authors say that they used IO schema instead of BIO in their dataset, which, if I am not wrong, means they just tag the corresponding Entity Type or "O" in case the word is not a Named Entity. What advantage does this method have? I would imagine that it just takes away valuable information from the model and makes it harder to detect entities that span multiple words
To my knowledge, there is no clear best among the different labelling schemes variants for NER: IO, BIO, BILO (L=last), BILOU (U=unique, for a unique word)... I might forget some.
In theory at least, the advantage of a simple scheme like IO is that the simplified set of labels may prevent the model from making mistakes cases where a word or type of word can appear in any position of an entity, for instance. A more complex scheme can be more accurate but is more likely to lead to overfitting, because the sample of cases for one class is smaller.
If possible, it's preferable to evaluate the different options and pick the best for specific target data.