-1
$\begingroup$

Given a machine reaches a broken state, there are potentially fixes that can to be applied to get the machine to run again. We'd like to know if, for the problem further defined below, with millions of datapoints, hundreds of features, and tens of labels, should we be looking at using a single deep neural network with multiple outputs, or create an ensemble of binary networks with human-selected features presumed better for their relevance? Is there a standard approach?

The state of the machine is captured in potentially hundreds of features, a good mix of continuous values and categorical data. We have millions of documented cases of machine states, and can identify when a machine had broke and what fixes were applied to get it running again. There are less than 40 fixes we are interested in, and we are considering a bucket for "other" fixes, and a bucket for "unfixable".

We are treating this as a multi-label classification, because it may take multiple discrete fixes (Fix-1, Fix-2...Fix-N) to get the machine up and running again. Not all features would be relevant to each fix, so the question we're wondering is whether each fix should have its own binary classification (each outputing a single value representing Fix-i or not Fix-i) network with what we think are the relevant features, or should we create one giant deep neural network with multiple labels, sigmoid over each fix (Fix-1, Fix-2...Fix-N). With the latter approach, should combinations of fixes be represented as their own label (Fix-1, Fix-2, Fix-1&2, Fix-3, Fix-1&3, Fix-2&3, Fix-1&2&3 ... etc).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

This kind of setup is normally addressed with a single neural network that has an output sigmoid layer of $N$ units (where $N$ is the number of possible fixes).

Having combinations of fixes represented with their own label does not make much sense; instead, let the different labels take the expected value: if 2 fixes are fine, let both expected outputs be 1.

Having $N$ networks each one generating a single fix-nofix is equivalent but does not benefit from the potential gains of the multitask learning obtained when training everything together and obtaining a shared internal representation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.