Let us consider a case where $1000$ data is given, i.e., the data set $U=\{x_1, \ldots, x_{1000}\}.$
When we want to use $k$-fold validation scheme, we first divide the data set into $k$ groups.
With out loss of generality, the parameter $k$ is assumed to be $10$.
Hence, we have $S_1=\{x_1, \ldots, x_{100}\}$, $S_2=\{x_{101}, \ldots, x_{200}\}$, $\ldots$, $S_{10}=\{x_{901}, \ldots, x_{1000}\}$.
I can obtain models, $f_k$, by learning a data set $U \setminus S_k$ for $k=1, 2, \ldots, 10$.
I can obtain error rates, $r_k$, by testing a data set $S_k$ with $f_k$.
Hence, I can obtain the error rates, $r$, by averaging $r_k$'s, i.e., $\sum_{k=1}^{10}r_k/10$.
I understand the $k$-fold cross validation so far.
Most materials I've seen just say the error rate averaged by $k$ scenarios in $k$-fold cross validation. However, they do no t say about $f_k$'s.