# Why does a filter need to be applied to the output of the input gate before cell state is added to?

In a neural network there are 4 gates: input, output, forget and a gate whose output performs element wise multiplication with the output of the input gate, which is added to the cell state (I don't know the name of this gate, but it's the one in the below picture with the output C_tilde).

Why is the addition of the C_tilde gate required in the model? In order to allow the input gate to subtract from the cell state, we could change the activation function that results in i_t from sigmoid to tanh and remove the C_tilde gate.

My reasoning is that the input gate already has a weight matrix W_i that can is being multiplied to the input gate's input, hence it already does filtering. However, when C_tilde is multiplied with i_t that seems to be another unnecessary filter.

My proposed input gate would then be i_t = tanh(W_i * [h_t-1, x_t] + b_i) and i_t would directly be added to C_t (C_t = f_t * C_t + i_t rather than C_t = f_t * C_t + i_t * C_tilde_t).

Here is my hypothesis : The $i_t$ can add explainability to the model, as the value of the sigmoid function can give an idea as to how important a particular word is to altering the cell state $C$. This is because $i_t$ lies between 0 and 1. Having single $W$ do both filtering as well as a feature transform of $[h_{t-1},x_t]$ not only puts more stress on the matrix (has to do two things at once), but also no longer has this explainability factor.
Example: 2 vectors may require the same transformation $W*v$, but unless you allow seperate sigmoid function to give each an importance, their contribution to the cell state will remain same.