When comparing several regression models in terms of quality, it seems like most have agreed on the MSE. There are also papers comparing "variance" and "variance accounted for (VAF)". However, there seems to be a controversial opinion about the variance (R^2). Should it nevertheless be compared in a scientific paper?

enter image description here

And what does VAF say? Is the VAF still a good measure of regression models?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.