I am playing with KNN on the Iris Dataset

I expected to get 100% accuracy with $K=1$ since every point should predict itself based on the Voronoi volume around it created by the KNN algorithm.

However using Scikit Learn I do not find this result. Here is my code.

import pandas as pd
import numpy as np

from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix
from sklearn.datasets import load_iris 

iris = load_iris()

X = pd.DataFrame(iris['data']) 

X.columns = ['sepalLength','sepalWidth','petalLength','petalWidth']

featureX = 'sepalLength' 
featureY = 'sepalWidth'

X_2 = X[[featureX,featureY]]

y = iris['target'] 

y = (np.array(y)==2).astype(np.int)

knn = KNeighborsClassifier(n_neighbors=1, p=2) 
knn.fit(X_2, y)  
y_pred = knn.predict(X_2)  
cm = confusion_matrix(y, y_pred)  


I get the following output for the confusion matrix. I see 11 out of 150 samples are incorrectly classified.

[[95  5]

 [ 6 44]]

Why is it not perfect ?

  • $\begingroup$ Is it just me, or are you running predictions on your training features? y_pred = knn.predict(X_2) $\endgroup$ – SummerEla May 12 '20 at 20:30

In your training set (X_2,y), there are some samples with the same input features X_2 but different labels y. For example, the 73rd and 147th samples, which are labelled into class 0 and 1, respectively, have the same input values [6.3, 2.5]. There are more samples like this in the dataset. Therefore, you could not construct a perfect classifier for such data.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.