I am a researcher working on my first deep learning project, which consists of using a CNN (pre-trained VGG16+2 densely connected layers) to classify drone imagery of vegetation.

In trying to hack computing times for both training and prediction of new images, I am considering asking my employer for money to buy a (cheap) NVIDIA GPU.

Being a biologist and not a computer scientist, I do not have any sense of the upgrade this would get me. Searching online I found contradicting opinions.

I am currently working with Keras+Tensorflow on a desktop PC with i7, 3.6 ghz, 32 Gb RAM.

Question: how good a GPU would I need to get a sensible performance increase?

Thanks a lot!


1 Answer 1


According to this guy, he got a 15x increase from Intel i7 to GeForce 1070.

You also may consider using AWS. You can use a machine 100x as powerful (as a single 1070) and your employer may find it attractive because the upfront sunk cost is zero.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the suggestions. For completeness, I tried with a colleague's old nvidia graphic card, a Quadro K620. Despite it being low-end and not optimized for deep learning, I got a 5x speed increase in training the same model (once I got around the installation of tensorflow-gpu). Thus, cheap GPU beats powerful CPU. $\endgroup$
    – Levasco
    Feb 22, 2019 at 18:01
  • $\begingroup$ For context, you may want to look into building a high end Gaming machine. You can spend as much on the video card(s) as you would on the rest of the components. $\endgroup$
    – B Seven
    Feb 22, 2019 at 18:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Levasco - You've probably seen this, but its another good reference: datascience.stackexchange.com/questions/14941/… $\endgroup$
    – B Seven
    Feb 22, 2019 at 18:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.