I'm trying to analyze a behavior called "sentiment flipping" of users in a dataset, but I'm not able to step on.

Let's suppose that I have two groups of users, say them good and bad users.

My dataset contains N tweets that classified into 6 topics. The tweets were created by the bad and good users.

The 6 topics are about general issues, but 3 of these topics are about organization/individuals supported (A) by the "bad" users and the other 3 are against (B) their ideologies.

The difference between the bad and good users in their tweeting behavior is:

  • The good user posted tweets in some of the topics (and maybe all of them) without forcing "positive" or "negative" sentiment in the topics.
  • The bad user posted tweets contain negative sentiment on the topics against her/his ideologies and positive sentiment on the topics she/he supports. The clear difference between both users also is that the bad user posts negative sentiment profusely on B topics and positive sentiment on A topics.

How can I measure/show this flipping behavior in a score/value; given that each tweet is represented by a vector like: <# of Pos words, # of Neg words>.

I think a good solution will consider how dense and ideologically clear the bad user behavior.

This image summarizes the previous description:

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ What if you gave every user an emotionalism and bias rating? $\endgroup$ – Tasty213 Aug 23 '19 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Tasty213 yes this is what i am looking for .. but with considering the topics. $\endgroup$ – user_007 Aug 24 '19 at 21:36

So I have a theory for this. We want to be able to distinguish users who are emotional and biased from those that are unemotional and unbiased. $$M = emotionality\\ B = Bias\\ t_i = tweet\ number\ i\\ b_i = bad\ words\ in\ t_i\\ p_i = good\ words\ in\ t_i\\ w_i = words\ in\ t_i\\ M = \frac{(b_i+p_i)}{w_i}\\ B = \frac{(b_i-p_i)^2}{w_i}\\ $$

M is the emotionality because it calculates the frequency that word is going to be an emotional one (instead of a descriptive one).

B is the bias because biased tweets will have more good (or bad) words than ones that hold both sides equally.

I don't know if this prediction will hold true, but i reckon if you plot each tweets x as bias and y as emotionality with a hue of good or bad, there will be two clusters (i am eager to be shown to be mistaken this certainly sounds like an interesting problem)!

  • $\begingroup$ Your extracting the ratio of "emotionality" for user(x) only. you don't consider the topics, which is the needed one. The bias should be in terms of topics. $\endgroup$ – user_007 Aug 23 '19 at 14:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.