1
$\begingroup$

I'm looking to pre-train a model for an RL agent but I'm having some trouble figuring some stuff out.

Dataset: Minerl MineRLNavigateDense-v0

The observation space includes :

2D screen input (64,64) (+ 3 channels of color) 1D (scalar) compass angle 1D (scalar) number of dirt blocks + this is all over time.

I am also given the reward based on the action the human took.

When training a model using a CNN for time series classification my understanding is that each feature (out of k total features) at a given point in time can be represented as a scalar value (visualized as each box in each row) and then the "time" component can be visualized by each row being a new timestep:

Visual of what I'm trying to explain

My question is: How do you set up the training data in such a way where this sort of CNN can be used to train on, particularly because each datapoint has a different dimension, do we just flatten the screen input into 64*64*3=12288 new features? Because that feels wrong.

UPDATE:
My first problem, combining the 2D image and the scalar data points was answered on Discord group I am in. In Keras at least, there's these special layer types called "merge layers" https://keras.io/layers/merge/ A CNN can be applied to the image first, then merged with the scalar data, this could then be passed into a 1D CNN to add the temporal component, however I haven't actually done any of this yet. :)

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I do not see how each datapoint would have a different dimension (you have simply 2 extra scalars, always). Could you clarify that?

Two solutions come to my head.

The first one would be to incorporate the scalars into the original picture - augment the picture with it. So that you would have, for example, an extra row for each scalar and end up with a picture of size 66*64. How to do it reasonably is another question - I do not have experience with any problem exactly like this, but using simply one pixel for the value seems pretty marginal. Maybe having the whole row of pixels be the same, representing the value... Or maybe add another dimension and filling all the points in that dimension with the representation of the scalar.

Another solution would be to create an extra branch in the model for the scalar features (with their own classifier) and then merge them with another classifier. I personally have never done it before, but this article https://www.pyimagesearch.com/2019/02/04/keras-multiple-inputs-and-mixed-data/ seems to explain it quite well. At this site, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47818968/adding-an-additional-value-to-a-convolutional-neural-network-input/47819063 you can also find another brief example of the code (and the guy is basically proposing both ways that I mentioned above :) )

I hope this gives you at least an idea. You will need to play with it a bit to choose the best alternative.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The first point seems like a very counter-intuitive solution and I'm not sure how generally applicable it is. The second point is what I heard from another person, I'm guessing it's the correct answer to my problem and it seems more "sturdy" in general. $\endgroup$ – MouseAndKeyboard Nov 22 '19 at 8:17
  • $\begingroup$ To me it does not sound counter-intuitive at all, you need to code the information for the computer somehow and this is one way to do it. In principle, the CNN does not care that it is not really a part of the original screen input. $\endgroup$ – Jakub Nov 22 '19 at 8:35
  • $\begingroup$ It wasn't an attack :p. Just mentioning how it feels strange to be embedding more info into the video input. Either way, thank you for the response :) $\endgroup$ – MouseAndKeyboard Nov 22 '19 at 8:37
  • $\begingroup$ No problem, didn't consider it an attack :) What I did not consider is that if you work with video this would have an extra size effect, which might be problematic. Anyway, the second option will be fine, it is just a bit more complicated. $\endgroup$ – Jakub Nov 22 '19 at 8:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.