# Evaluating a Multi-Label Classification model

I currently have a multi-label classification problem, for which I am using keras to build a neural network as follows:

n_cols = dataset.shape[1]
print(n_cols)

model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(26, activation='sigmoid')) # Sigmoid for multi-label classification

sgd = SGD(lr=0.1, decay=1e-6, momentum=0.5, nesterov=True)
#RMSprop
model.compile(loss='binary_crossentropy', optimizer='RMSprop', metrics=['accuracy'])

model.summary()

## Fit the model ##
early_stopping_monitor = EarlyStopping(patience=20)
history = model.fit(dataset, labels, validation_split=0.33, epochs=30, callbacks=[early_stopping_monitor])

plt.plot(history.history['accuracy'])
plt.plot(history.history['val_accuracy'])
plt.title('Model accuracy')
plt.ylabel('Accuracy')
plt.xlabel('Epoch')
plt.legend(['Train', 'Test'], loc='upper left')
plt.show()


I was informed that for multi-label classification, we use binary_crossentropy for the loss while having sigmoid for activation in the final layer (output layer). However, with this I am getting a resulting accuracy and val_accuracy of ~0.0931 and ~0.0937 respectively.

For the multi-label classification, is using the accuracy metric the best fit? I've looked around and some suggest that other metrics such as binary_accuracy may be better..

So the question is, how can one best evaluate the multi-label classification?

EDIT: For reference, I have 26 label columns in my target "classes" and the dataset consist of 21 columns. The entire dataset the model is trained on has ~82k samples.

If you choose metrics=['accuracy'], Keras automatically infers the accuracy metric according to the loss function. Four your case, since the loss function is BinaryCrossentropy, Keras has already chosen the metrics=['BinaryAccuracy'].