3
$\begingroup$

I have a dataset with one of the categorical columns having a considerable number of missing values. The interesting thing about this column is that it has values only for a particular category in "another" column .

For eg :

column 1                        column2
========================================
Google                             -
Google                             -
Google                             -
Google                             -
Facebook                        Image
Facebook                        Video
Facebook                        Image

My column of interest has values only for one category (Facebook) that is present in another column. Therefore, the missing values for google cannot be imputed with average, cannot be predicted and those rows cannot be ignored either.

In such a situation, is it wise to consider the missing values '-' as a separate category in one-hot encoding? Or will this affect my machine learning model badly?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To me it depends and you have to make some test both with and without variable. Did you also try to merge column 1 and column 2 variables ? (In your example, you could make 3 variables Google, FacebookImage and FacebookVideo). That's another thing you can try to avoid having 2 highly correlated columns. $\endgroup$
    – Adept
    Aug 21, 2020 at 14:19

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
3
$\begingroup$

You could break the column 2 from your example into number of columns : Image,Video....

So the new features will be like:

Column1  Image  Video  
Google     0      0
Google     0      0
Facebook   1      0
Facebook   0      1
Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ We can follow this method for all kinds of categorical columns? $\endgroup$
    – Vikas Ukani
    Sep 19, 2020 at 5:23
  • $\begingroup$ Suppose, There is an categorical feature in which there are too many unique values, For that, This method goes wrong, Right? $\endgroup$
    – Vikas Ukani
    Sep 19, 2020 at 5:24
2
$\begingroup$

You can try this:

import pandas as pd

df_new = pd.get_dummies(df, columns=['column2'])
print(df_new)

Output:

    column1  column2_Image  column2_Video
0    Google              0              0
1    Google              0              0
2    Google              0              0
3    Google              0              0
4  Facebook              1              0
5  Facebook              0              1
6  Facebook              1              0
Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ What if there are many unique values in column_2, For Instance, Image, Video, PDF, DOC, Excel, Audio, etc. $\endgroup$
    – Vikas Ukani
    Sep 19, 2020 at 5:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It will work. For example, if you add a new value (email), a new column will be added: column2_Email column2_Image column2_Video $\endgroup$
    – Soumendra Mishra
    Sep 19, 2020 at 6:37
  • $\begingroup$ Is there any disadvantages of too many features column, Suppose I use this method and I got 200+ feature in my DataFrame. So, There is and negative point of this kind of problem? $\endgroup$
    – Vikas Ukani
    Sep 19, 2020 at 6:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is no performance issues. It all depends on your use case. $\endgroup$
    – Soumendra Mishra
    Sep 19, 2020 at 6:54
  • $\begingroup$ @VikasUkani If you want to use one hot encoding, I would suggest to use OneHotEncoder function instead of pd.get_dummies. Both of them perform the same function but the advantage of OneHotEncoder is that during deployment, if an entirely new feature comes, then pd.get_dummies will give an error. But OneHotEncoder won't if you just specify the parameter handle_unknown = 'ignore'. $\endgroup$
    – spectre
    Aug 6, 2021 at 9:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.