5
$\begingroup$

... assuming that tables allowed for nested non-primitive values.

I'm trying to think of any instance where data cannot be represented as tables (or a series of tables)... and I can't think of any. However, I'm skeptical of myself on this one... its seems too simple to defined a pseudo-law which state "all data can be represented as tables".

Can anybody think of instances where this isn't true?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just make a 1x1 table and put your data in it $\endgroup$ – theonlygusti Nov 7 '20 at 20:57
8
$\begingroup$

One way or another any data can be represented in a table or even in a big binary string, since after all the physical memory of a computer is just one big binary sequence. But the question is whether the table format adequately represents the semantics of any data, and the answer is definitely no: while there are tabular representations for graphs, text, images or videos, these representations simplify and/or make assumptions about the nature of the data. Virtually any representation is a simplification of the data it represents, but some representations are more faithful to the original data than others.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ what an amazing answer with so much content in not so many words $\endgroup$ – German C M Nov 9 '20 at 14:00
  • $\begingroup$ @GermanCM thank you! It's funny, I didn't expect this answer to receive much attention. In retrospect I think I was influenced by my vague memories of linguistics, where the distinction representation vs. meaning is a fundamental principle. $\endgroup$ – Erwan Nov 9 '20 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ Actually this is faulty: some data cannot be represented in a table. For example a continuous function cannot be represented in a table. As the table loses information on what happens between the "points". The function itself holds the information. -- I'm wondering however if the OP also would consider this, or only discrete "data" and not the more general idea of information/data. $\endgroup$ – paul23 Nov 9 '20 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ @paul23 you're right, in my answer I assumed that OP was talking about data as a discrete subset of some original data. $\endgroup$ – Erwan Nov 9 '20 at 17:20
3
$\begingroup$

Not sure that's impossible but some data is inherently hard to represent tabularly :

  • Cloud points like the ones processed in this paper : https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.00593.pdf Similarly time series with variable sampling frequencies
  • Graphs that evolve in time like the relations in a social network
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.