2
$\begingroup$

Our little group at uni is investigating if there is a relationship between 3 measures of social well-being (social anxiety, social connectedness and self esteem) and usage time (on-screen time in hours) on several social media platforms. Would you recommend that we use correlation or regression in this case?

Thanks in advance :)

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

You need to provide us with more information on your variables, are they categorical or numerical? If usage time is numerical then you can build a linear regression model and the get the coefficients and associated p-values out of it.

If all variables are numerical you could calculate the correlation between them, but the linear model gives more information / is superior.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Hi! Thanks for the feedback. All variables are numerical - that is usage time and social well-being measures (questionnaire scores). I guess this means we can build a regression model then? Which one should be the IV and which would be the DV? If we have usage time for multiple social media platforms (9 platforms) and 3 measures for social well-being, will this be multiple regression? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 14, 2018 at 9:25
  • $\begingroup$ Linear model would be my choice. (FYI Linear models work with both categorical and numerical independent variables and a numerical dependent variable) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 14, 2018 at 9:28
  • $\begingroup$ usage time is you DV, the other 3 are your IV's, this is multiple regression. In R lm(usage~v1+v2+v3) $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 14, 2018 at 9:47
1
$\begingroup$

If you want to predict things that can't be precisely measured (such as social anxiety, social connectedness, and self esteem) I recommend using your numerical screen time data to perform principal component analysis.

In short, principal component analysis "uses an orthogonal transformation to convert a set of observations of possibly correlated variables into a set of values of linearly uncorrelated variables called principal components."

The principal components CAN be interpreted as measurements of something you don't have a measurement for, in this case self esteem, etc... This is a pretty big stretch so if you are doing this in a rigorous academic environment then you are going to need something more to back up your claims.

Read paragraph 2.5 in this paper to see what I mean: http://www.math.montana.edu/jobo/writing/documents/barbour.pdf

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.